Da habituação individual à construção de nichos por meio da ritualização de grupos: uma descrição partindo da minimização dos erros de predição
Palavras-chave:
Habituação, Orientação da Atenção, Ritualização de Grupos, Modulação de Recursos Cognitivos, Criação de Nichos
Resumo
O presente artigo explora como a Inferência Ativa (IA) e o Processamento Preditivo (PP) vêm sendo utilizados como frameworks para o entendimento da neuro-cognição e do comportamento dentro das ciências cognitivas e evolucionistas da religião (CESR), particularmente no estudo da ritualização humana. Argumenta-se que, enquanto a IA oferece uma perspectiva ampla e unificadora baseada na minimização dos erros de predição, o PP fornece um relato mais específico e focado, o qual vem sendo agenciado em investigações sobre o desenvolvimento de hábitos individuais, sua relação com rituais coletivos e potencial papel na construção de nichos. Aqui, a sugestão seria a de que, ao longo da história, o comportamento ritualizado teria modulado recursos neuro-cognitivos individuais e facilitado o compartilhamento de interpretações intragrupos que, por sua vez, teriam permitido o alinhamento de populações humanas ao longo dos processos evolutivos de alteração de seus ambientes de desenvolvimento. Ao enfocar o estudo dos rituais sob as lentes da IA e do PP, o artigo busca explorar como, a despeito de questionamentos acerca de seu suporte empírico, o uso desses frameworks pelas CESR demonstra seu poder como heurísticas para descobertas nas ciências comportamentais e do cérebro e, em última análise, sua utilidade instrumental em promover investigações transdisciplinares, gerando novos insights e promovendo a
reinterpretação de descobertas preexistentes acerca do comportamento humano.
Referências
ALVAREZ, J. & EMORY, E. Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Meta-Analytic Review. Neuropsychology Review, v. 16, 2006, p. 17-42.
BARRETT, J. Cognitive Science of Religion: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, v. 50, n. 2, 2011, p. 229–239.
BECHTEL, W. & HAMILTON, A. Reduction, Integration, and the Unity of Science: Natural, Behavioral, and Social Sciences and the Humanities. In: KUIPERS, T. (Org.). General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, p. 377-430.
BELLINI-LEITE, S. Surfing Uncertainty: Predições Situadas? Ciências & Cognição, v. 23 n.2, 2018.
BOGACZ, R. A tutorial on the free-energy framework for modeling perception and learning.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology, v. 76, 2017, p. 198-211.
BOYER, P. & LIÉNARD, P. Why Ritualized Behavior? Precaution Systems and Action Parsing in Developmental, Pathological and Cultural Rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences v. 29, n. 6, 2006, p. 595-650.
BRUINENBERG, J.; KIVERSTEIN, J. & RIETVELD, E. The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, v. 195, 2018, p. 2417-2444.
BUCKLEY, C. et al. The free energy principle for action and perception: A mathematical review. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, v. 81, 2017, p. 55-79.
CAMPBELL, J. Universal Darwinism as a Process of Bayesian Inference. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, v. 10, n. 49, 2016, p. 1-8.
CAO, R. New Labels for Old Ideas: Predictive Processing and the Interpretation of Neural Signals. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, v. 11, 2020, p. 517-546.
CARTER, C. et al., The Contribution of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex to Executive Processes in Cognition. Reviews in Neuroscience, v. 10, 1999, p. 49-57.
CLARK, A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 36, n. 3, 2013, p. 181-253.
CLARK, A. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
CLARK, A. Replies to Critics. In: COLOMBO, M; IRVINE, E; STAPLETON, M. (Orgs.). Andy Clark and His Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, p. 266-302.
CISEK, P. An evolutionary perspective on embodiment. In: Robinson, M & Thomas, L. (Orgs.). Handbook of embodied psychology: Thinking, feeling, and acting. Berna: Springer Nature, 2021, p. 547-571.
COLOMBO, M. & WRIGHT, C. Explanatory pluralism: An unrewarding prediction error for
free energy theorists. Brain and Cognition, v. 112, 2017, p. 3-12.
CONSTANT, A. et al. A variational approach to niche construction. J. R. Soc. Interface, v. 15, n. 141, 2018, p. 1-14.
CONANT, R. & ASHBY, W; Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. Int. J. Syst. Sci., v. 1, 1970, p. 89-97.
CORCORAN, A.; PEZZULO, G. & HOHWY, J. From Allostatic Agents to Counterfactual Cognisers: Active Inference, Biological Regulation, and The Origins of Cognition. Biology & Philosophy, v. 35, n. 32, 2020, p. 1-45.
DU BOIS, J. The Stance Triangle. In: ENGLEBRETSON, R. (Org.). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2007, pp. 139-182.
EMIRBAYER, M. & MISHE, A. What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 4, 1998, p. 962-1023.
FLETCHER, P. & FRITH. C. Perceiving is believing: A Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, v. 10, 2009, p. 48-58.
FINGERHUT, J. Habits and the Enculturated Mind: Pervasive Artifacts, Predictive Processing, and Expansive Habits. In: CARUANA, F. & TESTA, I. (Orgs.). Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 352-375.
FRANCONERI, S., ALVAREZ, G. & CAVANAGH, P. Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 17, n. 3, 2013, p. 131-141.
FRISTON, K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 360, n. 1456, 2005, p. 815-836.
FRISTON, K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci., v. 11, 2010, p. 127-138;
FRISTON, K; et al. Perceptions as hypotheses: Saccades as experiments. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 3, n. 151, 2012, p. 1-20.
FRITH, C. The social brain? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, v. 362, 2007, p. 671-678.
FRITH, C. The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, v. 367, 2012, p. 2213-2223.
FUSTER, J. Cortex and Mind: Unifying Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
GŁADZIEJEWSKI, P. Mechanistic unity of the predictive mind. Theory & Psychology, v. 29, n. 5, 2019, p. 657-675.
GEERTZ, C. A Interpretação das Culturas. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 1981.
GODFREY-SMITH, P. Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
GODFREY-SMITH, P. Environmental complexity and the evolution of cognition. In: STENBERG, R. & KAUFMAN, J. (Orgs.). The evolution of intelligence. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002, p. 233-249.
GOLDIN, P. et al. The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, v. 63, n. 6, 2008, p. 577-586.
HELTON, W. & WARM, J. Signal salience and mindlessness theory of vigilance. Acta Psychologica, v. 129, n. 1, 2008, p. 18-25.
HESP, C. et al. A Multi-scale View of the Emergent Complexity of Life: A Free-Energy Proposal. In: GEORGIEV, G. et al. (Orgs.). Evolution, Development and Complexity: Multiscale Evolutionary Models of Complex Adaptive Systems. Basingstoke: Springer Nature, 2019, p. 195-227.
HEIDER, F. Ding und medium. Symposium, v. 1, 1926, p. 109-157.
HEINTZ, C. Cultural Attraction Theory. In: CALLAN, H. (Org.). The International Encyclopaedia of Anthropology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2018, p. 1-10.
HOBSON, N. et al. The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, v. 22, n. 3, 2017, p. 260-284.
HOHWY, J. Attention and Conscious Perception in the Hypothesis Testing Brain. Front. Psychol., v. 3, 2012, p. 1-14.
HOHWY, J. The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
HOHWY, J. The Self-Evidencing Brain. Noûs, v. 50, n. 2, 2014, p. 259-285.
HOHWY, J. Self-supervision, normativity and the free energy principle. Synthese, v. 199, 2021, p. 29-53.
HUMPHREY, C. & LAIDLAW, J. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
IENNACO, M.; MAIA, T. & SAYEG, P. Processamento Preditivo: uma introdução à proposta de unificação da cognição humana. Principia, v. 27, n. 3, 2023, p. 425-452.
KAPITÁNY, R. Ritual Cognition: Ritualized Action and Artefact. Brisbane: University of Queensland, 2017.
KAPITÁNY, R. & NIELSEN, M. The Ritual Stance and the Precaution System: The Role of Goal-Demotion and Opacity in Ritual and Everyday Actions. Religion, Brain & Behavior, v. 7, n. 1, 2017, p. 27-42.
KILTENI, K. et al. Efference Copy Is Necessary for the Attenuation of Self-Generated Touch. iScience, v. 23, n. 2, 2020, p. 100843.
LANE, J. Rethinking the Cognitive Science of Religion in Light of Explanatory Pluralism. The Religious Studies Project, fev. 26, 2016.
LEGARE, C. & SOUZA, A. Evaluating Ritual Efficacy: Evidence from the Supernatural. Cognition, v. 124, n. 1, 2012, p. 1-15.
LIGHT, T. & WILSON, B. (Orgs.). Religion as a Human Capacity: A Festschrift in Honor of E. Thomas Lawson. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
LINSON, A. et al. The Active Inference Approach to Ecological Perception: General Information Dynamics for Natural and Artificial Embodied Cognition. Front. Robot. AI, v. 5, n. 21, 2018, p. 1-22.
LUHRMANN, T. & NUSBAUM, H., THISTED, R. The absorption hypothesis: Learning to hear God in evangelical Christianity. American Anthropologist, v. 112, v. 1, 2010, p. 66-78.
MAISTO, D; FRISTON, K; PEZZULO, G. Caching mechanisms for habit formation in Active Inference. Neurocomputing, v. 359, 2019, p. 298-314.
MARVAN, T. & HAVLÍK, M. Is predictive processing a theory of perceptual consciousness? New Ideas in Psychology, v. 61, 2021, p. 1-9.
MCMANIS, S. & SOMERS, D. Processing efficiency of divided spatial attention mechanisms in human visual cortex. Journal Neuroscience, v. 25, n. 41, 2005, 9444-9448.
MCNAY, E., MCCARTY, R., GOLD, P. Fluctuations in brain glucose concentration during behavioral testing: Dissociations between brain areas and between brain and blood. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, v. 75, n. 3, 2001, p. 325-327.
MIYAKE, A. et al. The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex ‘Frontal Lobe’ Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, v. 41, n. 1, 2000, p. 49-100.
MORINIS, A. The ritual experience: Pain and the transformation of consciousness in ordeals of initiation. Ethos, v. 13, n. 2, 1985, 150-174.
NAVE, K. A Drive to Survive: The Free Energy Principle and the Meaning of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2025.
NIELBO, K. & SØRENSEN, J. Spontaneous Processing of Functional and Non-Functional Action Sequences. Religion, Brain & Behavior, v. 1, n. 1, 2011, p. 18-30.
NIELBO, K. SCHØJEDT, U. & SØRENSEN, J. Hierarchical Organization of Segmentation in Non-Functional Action Sequences. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, v. 1, n. 1, 2013, p. 71-97.
ORLANDI, N. Bayesian perception is ecological perception. Philosophical Topics, v. 44, n. 2, 2016, p. 327-352.
PEZZULO, G. et al. Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioral control. Progress in Neurobiology, v. 134, 2015, p. 17-35.
PIETRASZEWSKI, D. & WERTZ, A. Why Evolutionary Psychology Should Abandon Modularity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021, p. 1-26.
POTH, N. Schema‑Centered Unity and Process‑Centered Pluralism of the Predictive Mind. Minds and Machines, 2022, p. 1-27.
PROUST, J. The Philosophy of Metacognition: Mental Agency and Self-Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
PROUST, J. & FORTIER, M. (Orgs.). Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
RAMÍREZ, J. & MARSHALL, J. Can natural selection encode Bayesian priors? Journal of Theoretical Biology, v. 426, n. 7, 2017, p. 57-66.
RAMSTEAD, M.; BADCOCK, P. & FRISTON, K. Answering Schrödinger's question: A free-energy formulation. Physics of Life Reviews, v. 24, 2018, p. 1-16.
RAMSTEAD, M.; KIRCHHOFF, M. & FRISTON, K. A tale of two densities: active inference is enactive inference. Adaptive Behaviour, v. 28, n. 4, 2019, p. 225-239.
RAPPAPORT. R. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
RICHARDS, J. The Cognitive Consequences of Concealing Feelings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, v.13, n. 4, 2004, p. 131-134.
ROSSANO, M. The Essential Role of Ritual in the Transmission and Reinforcement of Social
Norms. Psychological Bulletin, v. 138, n. 3, 2012, p. 529-549.
SCHØJEDT, U. Predictive Coding in the Study of Religion: a Believer’s Testimony. In: Petersen, A. et al. (Orgs.). Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion: a New Synthesis. Leiden: Brill, 2019, p. 364-379.
SCHJOEDT, U., STØDKILDE-JØRGENSEN, H., GEERTZ, A. & ROEPSTORFF, A. Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, v. 4, n. 2, 2009, p. 199-207.
SCHØJEDT, U., SØRENSEN, J., KRISTOFFER, N., XYGALATAS, D., MITKIDIS, P. & BULBULIA, J. Cognitive Resource Depletion in Religion Interactions. Religion, Brain & Behavior, v. 3, n. 1, 2013, p. 39-86.
SCHØJEDT, U. et al. The Power of Charisma: Perceived Charisma inhibits the frontal executive network of believers in intercessory prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, v. 6, n. 1, 2019, p. 119-127.
SCHØJEDT, U. & JENSEN, J. Depletion and deprivation: Social functional pathways to a shared metacognition. In: PROUST, J. & FORTIER, M. (Orgs.). Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, p. 319-342.
SCHÖRNER, G. Animal sacrifice in Roman Asia minor and its depictions: A cognitive approach. In: MEINECK, P. et al. (Orgs.). The Routledge Handbook of Classics and Cognitive Theory. London: Routledge, 2019, p. 373-382.
SCHULKIN, J. Habit Formation, Inference, and Anticipation: Continuous Themes in a Pragmatist Neuroscientific Perspective. In: CARUANA, F. & TESTA, I. (Orgs.). Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 41-57.
SIMS, M. Strong continuity of life and mind: the free energy framework, predictive processing and ecological psychology. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh, 2021.
SMEE, J; LALAND, K. & FELDMAN, M. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
SØRENSEN, J. Ritual. In: KOCH, A. & WILKENS, K. (Orgs.). THE BLOOMSBURY HANDBOOK OF THE CULTURAL AND COGNITIVE AESTHETICS OF RELIGION. London: Bloomsbury, 2020, p. 73-84.
SØRENSEN, J. Why cultures persist: toward a cultural immunology, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2023.
SPREVAK, M. Predictive coding I: Introduction. In: TBC; 2021, p 1-23.
SPREVAK, M. Predictive coding II: The computational level. In: TBC. 2021a, p. 1-28.
SPREVAK, M. Predictive coding IV: The implementation level. In: TBC, 2021b, p. 1-34.
STERLING, P. Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & Behavior, v. 106, n. 1, 2012, p. 5-15.
STEWART, J.; GAPENNE, O. & DI PAOLO, E. Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
TEUFEL, C. & FLETCHER, P. Forms of prediction in the nervous system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 21, 2020, p. 231-242.
THOMPSON, E. Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.
THORNTON, C. An informal reconstruction of the free-energy framework, examining the
conceptual problems that arise. Neuropsychologia, v. 173, 108281, 2022, p. 1-12.
WAADE, P. Confucian Free Energy: The Predictive Mind in Ancient China. PsyArXiv
Preprints, 2020, p. 1-22.
WHITEHOUSE, H. Rites of Terror: Emotion, Metaphor and Memory in Melanesian Initiation Cults. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, v. 2, n. 4, 1996, p. 703-715.
WHITEHOUSE, H. Ritual and Social Evolution: Understanding Social Complexity Through Data. In: BOZIC, B. et al. (Orgs.). Computational History and Data-Driven Humanities. Basingstoke: Springer, 2016, p. 3-14.
WHITEHOUSE, H. The Ritual Animal: Imitation and Cohesion in the Evolution of Social Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
WHITEHOUSE, H. & JONES, D. Modes of Religiosity. In: CLEMENTS, N. (Org.). Religion: Mental Religion. New York: GALE, 2017, p. 83-100.
WIESE, W. & METZINGER, T. Vanilla PP for Philosophers: A Primer on Predictive Processing. In: METZINGER, T. & WIESE, W. (Orgs.). Philosophy and Predictive Processing: 1. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group, 2017.
XYGALATAS, D. Culture, Cognition, and Ritual. In: MICHELE, J. et al. (Orgs.). Handbook of Advances in Culture and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024, p. 118-154.
XYGALATAS, D. & SCHØJEDT, U. Autobiographical memory in a fire-walking ritual. Journal of Cognition and Culture, v. 13, n. 1-2, 2013, p. 1-16.
BARRETT, J. Cognitive Science of Religion: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, v. 50, n. 2, 2011, p. 229–239.
BECHTEL, W. & HAMILTON, A. Reduction, Integration, and the Unity of Science: Natural, Behavioral, and Social Sciences and the Humanities. In: KUIPERS, T. (Org.). General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, p. 377-430.
BELLINI-LEITE, S. Surfing Uncertainty: Predições Situadas? Ciências & Cognição, v. 23 n.2, 2018.
BOGACZ, R. A tutorial on the free-energy framework for modeling perception and learning.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology, v. 76, 2017, p. 198-211.
BOYER, P. & LIÉNARD, P. Why Ritualized Behavior? Precaution Systems and Action Parsing in Developmental, Pathological and Cultural Rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences v. 29, n. 6, 2006, p. 595-650.
BRUINENBERG, J.; KIVERSTEIN, J. & RIETVELD, E. The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, v. 195, 2018, p. 2417-2444.
BUCKLEY, C. et al. The free energy principle for action and perception: A mathematical review. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, v. 81, 2017, p. 55-79.
CAMPBELL, J. Universal Darwinism as a Process of Bayesian Inference. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, v. 10, n. 49, 2016, p. 1-8.
CAO, R. New Labels for Old Ideas: Predictive Processing and the Interpretation of Neural Signals. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, v. 11, 2020, p. 517-546.
CARTER, C. et al., The Contribution of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex to Executive Processes in Cognition. Reviews in Neuroscience, v. 10, 1999, p. 49-57.
CLARK, A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 36, n. 3, 2013, p. 181-253.
CLARK, A. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
CLARK, A. Replies to Critics. In: COLOMBO, M; IRVINE, E; STAPLETON, M. (Orgs.). Andy Clark and His Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, p. 266-302.
CISEK, P. An evolutionary perspective on embodiment. In: Robinson, M & Thomas, L. (Orgs.). Handbook of embodied psychology: Thinking, feeling, and acting. Berna: Springer Nature, 2021, p. 547-571.
COLOMBO, M. & WRIGHT, C. Explanatory pluralism: An unrewarding prediction error for
free energy theorists. Brain and Cognition, v. 112, 2017, p. 3-12.
CONSTANT, A. et al. A variational approach to niche construction. J. R. Soc. Interface, v. 15, n. 141, 2018, p. 1-14.
CONANT, R. & ASHBY, W; Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. Int. J. Syst. Sci., v. 1, 1970, p. 89-97.
CORCORAN, A.; PEZZULO, G. & HOHWY, J. From Allostatic Agents to Counterfactual Cognisers: Active Inference, Biological Regulation, and The Origins of Cognition. Biology & Philosophy, v. 35, n. 32, 2020, p. 1-45.
DU BOIS, J. The Stance Triangle. In: ENGLEBRETSON, R. (Org.). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2007, pp. 139-182.
EMIRBAYER, M. & MISHE, A. What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 4, 1998, p. 962-1023.
FLETCHER, P. & FRITH. C. Perceiving is believing: A Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, v. 10, 2009, p. 48-58.
FINGERHUT, J. Habits and the Enculturated Mind: Pervasive Artifacts, Predictive Processing, and Expansive Habits. In: CARUANA, F. & TESTA, I. (Orgs.). Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 352-375.
FRANCONERI, S., ALVAREZ, G. & CAVANAGH, P. Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 17, n. 3, 2013, p. 131-141.
FRISTON, K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 360, n. 1456, 2005, p. 815-836.
FRISTON, K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci., v. 11, 2010, p. 127-138;
FRISTON, K; et al. Perceptions as hypotheses: Saccades as experiments. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 3, n. 151, 2012, p. 1-20.
FRITH, C. The social brain? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, v. 362, 2007, p. 671-678.
FRITH, C. The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, v. 367, 2012, p. 2213-2223.
FUSTER, J. Cortex and Mind: Unifying Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
GŁADZIEJEWSKI, P. Mechanistic unity of the predictive mind. Theory & Psychology, v. 29, n. 5, 2019, p. 657-675.
GEERTZ, C. A Interpretação das Culturas. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 1981.
GODFREY-SMITH, P. Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
GODFREY-SMITH, P. Environmental complexity and the evolution of cognition. In: STENBERG, R. & KAUFMAN, J. (Orgs.). The evolution of intelligence. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002, p. 233-249.
GOLDIN, P. et al. The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, v. 63, n. 6, 2008, p. 577-586.
HELTON, W. & WARM, J. Signal salience and mindlessness theory of vigilance. Acta Psychologica, v. 129, n. 1, 2008, p. 18-25.
HESP, C. et al. A Multi-scale View of the Emergent Complexity of Life: A Free-Energy Proposal. In: GEORGIEV, G. et al. (Orgs.). Evolution, Development and Complexity: Multiscale Evolutionary Models of Complex Adaptive Systems. Basingstoke: Springer Nature, 2019, p. 195-227.
HEIDER, F. Ding und medium. Symposium, v. 1, 1926, p. 109-157.
HEINTZ, C. Cultural Attraction Theory. In: CALLAN, H. (Org.). The International Encyclopaedia of Anthropology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2018, p. 1-10.
HOBSON, N. et al. The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, v. 22, n. 3, 2017, p. 260-284.
HOHWY, J. Attention and Conscious Perception in the Hypothesis Testing Brain. Front. Psychol., v. 3, 2012, p. 1-14.
HOHWY, J. The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
HOHWY, J. The Self-Evidencing Brain. Noûs, v. 50, n. 2, 2014, p. 259-285.
HOHWY, J. Self-supervision, normativity and the free energy principle. Synthese, v. 199, 2021, p. 29-53.
HUMPHREY, C. & LAIDLAW, J. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
IENNACO, M.; MAIA, T. & SAYEG, P. Processamento Preditivo: uma introdução à proposta de unificação da cognição humana. Principia, v. 27, n. 3, 2023, p. 425-452.
KAPITÁNY, R. Ritual Cognition: Ritualized Action and Artefact. Brisbane: University of Queensland, 2017.
KAPITÁNY, R. & NIELSEN, M. The Ritual Stance and the Precaution System: The Role of Goal-Demotion and Opacity in Ritual and Everyday Actions. Religion, Brain & Behavior, v. 7, n. 1, 2017, p. 27-42.
KILTENI, K. et al. Efference Copy Is Necessary for the Attenuation of Self-Generated Touch. iScience, v. 23, n. 2, 2020, p. 100843.
LANE, J. Rethinking the Cognitive Science of Religion in Light of Explanatory Pluralism. The Religious Studies Project, fev. 26, 2016.
LEGARE, C. & SOUZA, A. Evaluating Ritual Efficacy: Evidence from the Supernatural. Cognition, v. 124, n. 1, 2012, p. 1-15.
LIGHT, T. & WILSON, B. (Orgs.). Religion as a Human Capacity: A Festschrift in Honor of E. Thomas Lawson. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
LINSON, A. et al. The Active Inference Approach to Ecological Perception: General Information Dynamics for Natural and Artificial Embodied Cognition. Front. Robot. AI, v. 5, n. 21, 2018, p. 1-22.
LUHRMANN, T. & NUSBAUM, H., THISTED, R. The absorption hypothesis: Learning to hear God in evangelical Christianity. American Anthropologist, v. 112, v. 1, 2010, p. 66-78.
MAISTO, D; FRISTON, K; PEZZULO, G. Caching mechanisms for habit formation in Active Inference. Neurocomputing, v. 359, 2019, p. 298-314.
MARVAN, T. & HAVLÍK, M. Is predictive processing a theory of perceptual consciousness? New Ideas in Psychology, v. 61, 2021, p. 1-9.
MCMANIS, S. & SOMERS, D. Processing efficiency of divided spatial attention mechanisms in human visual cortex. Journal Neuroscience, v. 25, n. 41, 2005, 9444-9448.
MCNAY, E., MCCARTY, R., GOLD, P. Fluctuations in brain glucose concentration during behavioral testing: Dissociations between brain areas and between brain and blood. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, v. 75, n. 3, 2001, p. 325-327.
MIYAKE, A. et al. The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex ‘Frontal Lobe’ Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, v. 41, n. 1, 2000, p. 49-100.
MORINIS, A. The ritual experience: Pain and the transformation of consciousness in ordeals of initiation. Ethos, v. 13, n. 2, 1985, 150-174.
NAVE, K. A Drive to Survive: The Free Energy Principle and the Meaning of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2025.
NIELBO, K. & SØRENSEN, J. Spontaneous Processing of Functional and Non-Functional Action Sequences. Religion, Brain & Behavior, v. 1, n. 1, 2011, p. 18-30.
NIELBO, K. SCHØJEDT, U. & SØRENSEN, J. Hierarchical Organization of Segmentation in Non-Functional Action Sequences. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, v. 1, n. 1, 2013, p. 71-97.
ORLANDI, N. Bayesian perception is ecological perception. Philosophical Topics, v. 44, n. 2, 2016, p. 327-352.
PEZZULO, G. et al. Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioral control. Progress in Neurobiology, v. 134, 2015, p. 17-35.
PIETRASZEWSKI, D. & WERTZ, A. Why Evolutionary Psychology Should Abandon Modularity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021, p. 1-26.
POTH, N. Schema‑Centered Unity and Process‑Centered Pluralism of the Predictive Mind. Minds and Machines, 2022, p. 1-27.
PROUST, J. The Philosophy of Metacognition: Mental Agency and Self-Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
PROUST, J. & FORTIER, M. (Orgs.). Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
RAMÍREZ, J. & MARSHALL, J. Can natural selection encode Bayesian priors? Journal of Theoretical Biology, v. 426, n. 7, 2017, p. 57-66.
RAMSTEAD, M.; BADCOCK, P. & FRISTON, K. Answering Schrödinger's question: A free-energy formulation. Physics of Life Reviews, v. 24, 2018, p. 1-16.
RAMSTEAD, M.; KIRCHHOFF, M. & FRISTON, K. A tale of two densities: active inference is enactive inference. Adaptive Behaviour, v. 28, n. 4, 2019, p. 225-239.
RAPPAPORT. R. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
RICHARDS, J. The Cognitive Consequences of Concealing Feelings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, v.13, n. 4, 2004, p. 131-134.
ROSSANO, M. The Essential Role of Ritual in the Transmission and Reinforcement of Social
Norms. Psychological Bulletin, v. 138, n. 3, 2012, p. 529-549.
SCHØJEDT, U. Predictive Coding in the Study of Religion: a Believer’s Testimony. In: Petersen, A. et al. (Orgs.). Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion: a New Synthesis. Leiden: Brill, 2019, p. 364-379.
SCHJOEDT, U., STØDKILDE-JØRGENSEN, H., GEERTZ, A. & ROEPSTORFF, A. Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, v. 4, n. 2, 2009, p. 199-207.
SCHØJEDT, U., SØRENSEN, J., KRISTOFFER, N., XYGALATAS, D., MITKIDIS, P. & BULBULIA, J. Cognitive Resource Depletion in Religion Interactions. Religion, Brain & Behavior, v. 3, n. 1, 2013, p. 39-86.
SCHØJEDT, U. et al. The Power of Charisma: Perceived Charisma inhibits the frontal executive network of believers in intercessory prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, v. 6, n. 1, 2019, p. 119-127.
SCHØJEDT, U. & JENSEN, J. Depletion and deprivation: Social functional pathways to a shared metacognition. In: PROUST, J. & FORTIER, M. (Orgs.). Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, p. 319-342.
SCHÖRNER, G. Animal sacrifice in Roman Asia minor and its depictions: A cognitive approach. In: MEINECK, P. et al. (Orgs.). The Routledge Handbook of Classics and Cognitive Theory. London: Routledge, 2019, p. 373-382.
SCHULKIN, J. Habit Formation, Inference, and Anticipation: Continuous Themes in a Pragmatist Neuroscientific Perspective. In: CARUANA, F. & TESTA, I. (Orgs.). Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 41-57.
SIMS, M. Strong continuity of life and mind: the free energy framework, predictive processing and ecological psychology. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh, 2021.
SMEE, J; LALAND, K. & FELDMAN, M. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
SØRENSEN, J. Ritual. In: KOCH, A. & WILKENS, K. (Orgs.). THE BLOOMSBURY HANDBOOK OF THE CULTURAL AND COGNITIVE AESTHETICS OF RELIGION. London: Bloomsbury, 2020, p. 73-84.
SØRENSEN, J. Why cultures persist: toward a cultural immunology, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2023.
SPREVAK, M. Predictive coding I: Introduction. In: TBC; 2021, p 1-23.
SPREVAK, M. Predictive coding II: The computational level. In: TBC. 2021a, p. 1-28.
SPREVAK, M. Predictive coding IV: The implementation level. In: TBC, 2021b, p. 1-34.
STERLING, P. Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology & Behavior, v. 106, n. 1, 2012, p. 5-15.
STEWART, J.; GAPENNE, O. & DI PAOLO, E. Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
TEUFEL, C. & FLETCHER, P. Forms of prediction in the nervous system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, v. 21, 2020, p. 231-242.
THOMPSON, E. Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.
THORNTON, C. An informal reconstruction of the free-energy framework, examining the
conceptual problems that arise. Neuropsychologia, v. 173, 108281, 2022, p. 1-12.
WAADE, P. Confucian Free Energy: The Predictive Mind in Ancient China. PsyArXiv
Preprints, 2020, p. 1-22.
WHITEHOUSE, H. Rites of Terror: Emotion, Metaphor and Memory in Melanesian Initiation Cults. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, v. 2, n. 4, 1996, p. 703-715.
WHITEHOUSE, H. Ritual and Social Evolution: Understanding Social Complexity Through Data. In: BOZIC, B. et al. (Orgs.). Computational History and Data-Driven Humanities. Basingstoke: Springer, 2016, p. 3-14.
WHITEHOUSE, H. The Ritual Animal: Imitation and Cohesion in the Evolution of Social Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
WHITEHOUSE, H. & JONES, D. Modes of Religiosity. In: CLEMENTS, N. (Org.). Religion: Mental Religion. New York: GALE, 2017, p. 83-100.
WIESE, W. & METZINGER, T. Vanilla PP for Philosophers: A Primer on Predictive Processing. In: METZINGER, T. & WIESE, W. (Orgs.). Philosophy and Predictive Processing: 1. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group, 2017.
XYGALATAS, D. Culture, Cognition, and Ritual. In: MICHELE, J. et al. (Orgs.). Handbook of Advances in Culture and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024, p. 118-154.
XYGALATAS, D. & SCHØJEDT, U. Autobiographical memory in a fire-walking ritual. Journal of Cognition and Culture, v. 13, n. 1-2, 2013, p. 1-16.
Publicado
2025-11-07
Como Citar
M. M. Silva , T., C. de Sant’Anna, J. C., I. de Vasconcelos, M. L., S. dos Santos, L., F.F. Ribeiro, M., & Matoso, R. (2025). Da habituação individual à construção de nichos por meio da ritualização de grupos: uma descrição partindo da minimização dos erros de predição. ARARIPE — REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA - , 5(1), 270-314. https://doi.org/10.56837/Araripe.2024.v5.n1.1447
Seção
ARTIGOS
1 Ao submeter trabalhos à revista ARARIPE, caso este seja aprovado, o autor autoriza sua publicação sem quaisquer ônus para a revista ou para seus editores.
2 Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados na ARARIPE são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação reservados para este periódico.
3 Fica resguardado ao autor o direito de republicar seu trabalho, do modo como lhe aprouver (em sites, blogs, repositórios, ou na forma de capítulos de livros), desde que em data posterior fazendo a referência à revista ARARIPE como publicação original.
4 A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
5 Os originais não serão devolvidos aos autores.
6 As opiniões emitidas pelos autores são de sua inteira e exclusiva responsabilidade.
7 Ao submeterem seus trabalhos à ARARIPE os autores certificam que os mesmos são de autoria própria e inéditos, ou seja, não publicados anteriormente em qualquer meio digital ou impresso.
8 A revista ARARIPE adota a Política de Acesso Livre para os trabalhos publicados sendo sua publicação de acesso livre, pública e gratuita. Portanto, os autores ao submeterem seus trabalhos concordam que os mesmos são de uso gratuito sob a licença Creative Commons - Atribuição Não-comercial 4.0 Internacional.
9 O trabalho submetido poderá passar por algum software em busca de possíveis plágios para averiguar a autenticidade do material e, assim, assegurar a credibilidade das publicações da ARARIPE e do próprio autor diante da comunidade filosófica do país e do exterior.
10 Mas, apesar disto, após aprovação e publicação do artigo, for constatando qualquer ilegalidade, fraude, ou outra atitude que coloque em dúvida a lisura da publicação, em especial a prática de plágio, o trabalho estará automaticamente rejeitado.
11 Caso o trabalho já tenha sido publicado, será imediatamente retirado da base da revista ARARIPE, sendo proibida sua posterior citação vinculada a ela e, no número seguinte em que ocorreu a publicação, será comunicado o cancelamento da referida publicação. Em caso de deflagração do procedimento para a retratação do trabalho, os autores serão previamente informados, sendo-lhes garantidos o direito à ampla defesa.
12 Os dados pessoais fornecidos pelos autores serão utilizados exclusivamente para os serviços prestados por essa publicação, não sendo disponibilizados para outras finalidades ou a terceiros.
